Bob the Builder
Author: Flora Poli
Keywords: Philosophy, gender politics, class struggle, building, protective millinery
Programme title: Bob the Builder
Tagline: Can we fix it? Yes we can!
Devised by: Keith Chapman
Starring: Neil Morrissey, Kate Harbour, Rob Rackstraw
Broadcaster: BBC Television
Summary
Bob, a self-employed builder and handyman, leads a team of animated construction
vehicles. Whatever building, fixing, painting or construction work is
needed in the town, Bob and the gang are more than capable of getting the
job done. The popular children's television programme has even led to
not one but two number one pop songs.
Background
Actor Neil Morrissey, who provides the voice of popular children's television
character Bob, has commented that whenever he is out shopping and hears a
parent point him out as Bob the Builder, he inevitably finds himself face
to face with a disappointed child. 'I've seen Bob', he can imagine the
children thinking, 'and you're not him!' Morrissey's experience is emblematic
of the enigma that is Bob the Builder - arguably the most widely known handyman
in the country (with apologies to Tommy from Ground Force) and yet
one of the least understood figures of modern times.
Since Bob began his reign as the king of children's television in 1999, many
people have remained unaware of the deep philosophical roots that underpin
the programme, and of the radical political narrative that pulses through
the very lifeblood of the show.
Essentially modernist in it's philosophical outlook ("Can we fix it? Yes
we can!"), Bob the Builder was originally written with the intention
of introducing children to the world of philosophical thought. The character
of Bob is a thinly veiled parody of Bertrand Russell, and Bob's desire to
impose order on his town by tackling all of its construction needs is an obvious
extension of Russell's firmly held belief in the power of rational thought
to impose order and understanding on society.
It should be pointed out that there is an element of tension between Bob's
humanistic roots and the animism inherent within his mechanical workmates.
This can perhaps be seen as an attempt to reconcile the rational humanism
of Russell and his peers with a more post-modern appreciation of world-view
plurality. Alternatively, the animated machines could be seen as an
extreme illustration of functionalism within the theory of mind.
Russell's notoriously liberal approach to sexual morality is mirrored in
the battle for Bob's affections that takes place between Wendy and, among
others, Mrs Potts and Mavis from the Post Office. The sexuality of the
show is, of course, underplayed for the sake of the watching children, but
adult viewers of the series have long been aware of the slow-burning sexual
chemistry at the heart of the show. Even the casting of Morrissey, best known
for his sex-obsessed lad-about-town role in Men Behaving Badly, as
Bob's voice serves to reinforce the image of Bob as a free spirit, sowing
his seed wherever his fancy takes him. Bob's version of Mambo Number
5 may feature a list of DIY tasks such as 'digging up the roads' and 'moving
heavy loads', but the listener is surely intended to remember that the original
version by Lou Bega presents us with an almost endless list of ladies that
the singer has in mind for his social recreation.
The role of Wendy has also prompted great discussion as to whether Bob the
Builder represents a repressive example of patriarchal society, or a feminist
paradise. Although Wendy frequently joins in with Bob and the machines
to get the job done, Bob is rarely seen turning his hand to cooking, cleaning
and the like. Many regular viewers of the show (predominately the adult
female ones) have long hoped that the relationship between Bob and Wendy will
eventually result in children, so that Bob can be shown taking his fair share
of childcare responsibility.
Bob's relationship with his workforce of machines has also prompted much
discussion as to the socio-political leanings of the programme. Is Bob
representative of the entrepreneurial ideal of capitalism, as he monopolises
the construction needs of his community? Or perhaps his willingness
to share the work and rewards with his happy band of misfit machines points
towards a more egalitarian view of a society structured for the sake of the
many rather than the privileged few. Every episode of the programme
passes comment on the society that Bob finds himself a part of, and his attempts
to improve the way things are. Bob has a wide social vision, but whether
he works to reinforce and prop up a crumbling world order, or to usher in
a glorious new age remains unclear.
That Bob the Builder is highly politicised is not open to doubt. The
fact that it remains unclear whether the programme leans to the left, the
right, or even rejects the old political compass altogether, makes it a controversial
and potentially dangerous social experiment. How will the children of
Bob's generation express their politicisation as they grow to adulthood? The
hearts and minds of the future are being shaped by an enigmatic figure in
a hard hat. You have been warned.
IDEAS FOR DISCUSSION
1. An alternative reading of Bob the Builder sees parallels with the
Old Testament book of Nehemiah. Which aspects of the programme do you
think are most compatible with such a view, and which the most problematic?
2. Peruse 1 Corinthians 3: 10-15. What parallels are there between
the building described in this passage and that of Bob and his gang?
3. Read Matthew 7:24-27. Is Bob a wise or a foolish builder? Which
are you more like?
4. Is the anthropomorphic nature of the machines significant? To what
extent do you think this is a comment on the tendency of technology to take
on a life of it's own in industrialised society, proving harder and harder
for humans to safely control.
5. Literally, in the very title of the programme, Bob is defined by his actions
- he is Bob, the Builder. To what extent does his sense of self-worth
derive from what he does? How would you explain the doctrine of salvation
by grace to somebody who took a similar view to Bob?
6. Fix it - can we?
7. Obsession with means to end pragmatics defines Bob's existential role
within the social equilibrium of the show. Discuss.
8. "Only a child could fail to recognise the socio-political implications
of Bob. Only an adult could fail to be moved by them." (Oli Rofpal).
Do you agree with this assessment of the programme?
9. Look at the date that this study guide was posted on the Damaris website.
Author: Flora Poli
© Copyright: Flora Poli 2003
Back
Unless stated otherwise, Bible quotations are from the New Living Translation (NLT) copyright © 1996, 2004 by Tyndale Charitable Trust. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers.